Traffick - The Business of Search Engines & Web Portals
Blog Categories (aka Tags) Archive of Traffick Articles Our Internet Marketing Consulting Services Contact the Traffickers Traffick RSS Feed

HOME » TRAFFICK ARTICLES » ARTICLE

The "Real" Numbers Offer Clue to Google's Huge Lead

By Andrew Goodman, 6/14/2004

I've always been a stats junkie. In the search marketing
business, though, it hasn't been easy to get the data that matter most. You
hear conflicting reports about just how strong competing search engines such
as Yahoo, MSN, and Google Search are in the marketplace. For the past year
I've been trying hard (in seminars, on this site, as moderator of now-dormant
MarketingVox Search, etc.) to hammer home the point that Google's lead in
terms of search referrals is greater than it ever was, and greater than you
might think.



Never argue with the marketplace.



The argument is a difficult one to have in a context where the Chicken Littles
in the biz, typically bored insiders hoping for a shakeup, are always coming
up with some reason that the leader is about to take a precipitous dive in
popularity. And the average seminar attendee who has not been following the
progress of the online metrics agencies since 1998 will require a careful explanation
of just what "share of searches" or any number of other "who's in the lead" type
stats actually means. That can slow down the momentum of discussing what's
really going on out there. I can't tell you how many times I've tried to urge
marketers to narrow their focus on a few core online channels, only to have
them ignore the data and come away from the presentation vaguely muttering
about needing to "get a presence in the search engines, and it's all
so complicated..."



But it isn't that complicated. Flawed, subjective approaches to measurement
just make it so.



It's definitely important to question methodologies here, and presenting stats
from several sources seems paramount. Standard & Poor's, on the way to arriving
at a fair valuation for Google of a whopping $33 billion to $40 billion
,
commissioned a run-of-the-mill survey of 1,000 Internet users in the US and
found that Google was used/preferred (which?) by 48%, with Yahoo and MSN "a
distant second."



Not bad, since the number matches well with some numbers provided by comScore
Networks for the US in April. Depending on which one you look at, that shows
Google at 44%, Yahoo at 37%, and MSN a distant third.



Marketers shouldn't believe that number for a second. Last month, when ComScore
released Canadian data showing that Google's market share was 61%, it didn't
make sense to me that its number was so much lower in the US, and that Yahoo
was the cause of that low US market share number for Google.



There is no denying that Yahoo is a very popular and profitable web property,
and people are conducting a lot of different kinds of "searches" on there that
deserve to be counted, but from a marketer's standpoint it just does not seem
as if these are the kinds of searches that actually translate into search referrals
to our clients' websites. Ever since Yahoo dropped its directory, and more
so with the ascendancy of Google Search, and perhaps even more so after Yahoo
dropped Google as its provider of index search, it doesn't seem like Yahoo
is referring a lot of searches of the "web search" variety.



Now that the international
survey from comScore
, based on its qSearch panel-based methodology, is
out, the strength of Google in international markets is emphasized even more.
The key metric that this survey focuses on is the "share of searches" in a
given month. What comScore has done this time around to simplify the measurements
is to measure the percentage share of only the top three search destinations.
So in the Canadian case, dropping minor players out of the calculation, Google
now clocks in at 70%, with Yahoo trailing badly at 17%. It's tough to sugar-coat
a disparity that wide. Frankly it does not bode well for Yahoo. Endlessly-touted
vaporware by MSN Search has yet to materialize, so perhaps appropriately, it
languishes at 13%.



Like AOL, both Yahoo and MSN have attempted to muscle their way into users'
consciousness by making deals with major domestic portals & ISP's. Recently
for example, Sympatico and MSN co-launched
a Canadian "super portal" initiative
with a well-publicized launch announcement
at a downtown Toronto furniture store, with the side theme being the "wired
home." Few journalists understood the point; page after page of full-color
newspaper ads far outstripped the column inches devoted to the dubious "launch." It's
fair to say you could count the number of interested users on two hands. The
face-saver for the two companies in the deal can always be the fact that anyone
subscribing to Sympatico's DSL service and using Hotmail can technically be
counted as someone taking advantage of the dubious "super portal" bundle.



Meanwhile, Google spends $0 on advertising, and has a 70% market share in Canada.
(Seth Godin must be smiling. His latest book, Free Prize Inside, emphasizes
the fact that delighting consumers is the way to win over markets, and that
expensive marketing campaigns rarely work today.)



Plus -- again according to the recent release by comScore based on its qSearch
survey -- Google's share of searches in France is 80% (10% Yahoo, 10% MSN);
and 77% in the UK (14% Yahoo, 9% MSN). And that leaves dozens of large markets
without accurate share-of-searches measurements for us to assess, but clearly,
most of them are going to show Google well over 50%. This massive popularity
points to a real opportunity and hints at some real challenges that will face
Google as it grows into its role as a maturing international company. But above
all, contrary to what you might have been told, it shows that portals like
Yahoo, MSN, and AOL have an uphill climb if they're to convince significant
numbers of users to use them for their daily search engine needs.



Worse news for the established portal players is that Google has now signaled
its willingness to fight for market share in web-based email. GMail is currently
growing virally with no need for advertising. What might be around the corner?

Andrew Goodman is Editor-at-Large of Traffick.com and the author of "Winning Results with Google Adwords". 

 

Speaking Engagement

I am speaking at SMX Milan

Need Solid Advice?        

Google AdWords book


Andrew's book, Winning Results With Google AdWords, (McGraw-Hill, 2nd ed.), is still helping tens of thousands of advertisers cut through the noise and set a solid course for campaign ROI.

And for a glowing review of the pioneering 1st ed. of the book, check out this review, by none other than Google's Matt Cutts.


Posts from 2002 to 2010


07/2002
08/2002
09/2002
10/2002
11/2002
12/2002
01/2003
02/2003
03/2003
04/2003
05/2003
06/2003
07/2003
08/2003
09/2003
10/2003
11/2003
12/2003
01/2004
02/2004
03/2004
04/2004
05/2004
06/2004
07/2004
08/2004
09/2004
10/2004
11/2004
12/2004
01/2005
02/2005
03/2005
04/2005
05/2005
06/2005
07/2005
08/2005
09/2005
10/2005
11/2005
12/2005
01/2006
02/2006
03/2006
04/2006
05/2006
06/2006
07/2006
08/2006
09/2006
10/2006
11/2006
12/2006
01/2007
02/2007
03/2007
04/2007
05/2007
06/2007
07/2007
08/2007
09/2007
10/2007
11/2007
12/2007
01/2008
02/2008
03/2008
04/2008
05/2008
06/2008
07/2008
08/2008
09/2008
10/2008
11/2008
12/2008
01/2009
02/2009
03/2009
04/2009
05/2009
06/2009
07/2009
08/2009
09/2009
10/2009
11/2009
12/2009
01/2010
02/2010
03/2010
04/2010

 


Traffick - The Business of Search Engines & Web Portals

 


Home | Categories | Archive | About Us | Internet Marketing Consulting | Contact Us
© 1999 - 2013 Traffick.com. All Rights Reserved